Deaf and Disability Arts Practices in Canada
The Research, Measurement and Data Analytics Section of the Canada Council for the Arts engaged the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) and a research team to carry out a study on Deaf and disability arts practices in Canada. [1]
Outcomes
The results of the study derive from the researchers’ review of pertinent literature and interviews with artists and cultural workers. Their report offers a broad picture of Deaf artists and artists with disabilities in Canada, their artistic practices and latest innovations, and related findings concerning accessibility, equity, self-determination, and support.
Based on the experiences and viewpoints of the artists and cultural workers consulted, the report offers best practices to the arts sector grouped according to five major hurdles: funding; accessibility; cultural representation; communications; and equity, diversity and inclusion in cultural, artistic and media milieus.
Release of the research report and overview - Deaf and Disability Arts Practices in Canada – ASL Video
This video, presented entirely in ASL, announces the release of the report and the overview of the study Deaf and Disability Arts Practices in Canada.
For key findings, please refer to the downloadable Executive Summary and Report:
To avoid document formatting errors, it is recommended to download the documents using Google Chrome, instead of opening/reading them with Internet Explorer or Firefox. It is also recommended to use the most updated version of Adobe Reader.
Document
Executive Summary (PDF 5.5 MB)
Document
Report (PDF 15.1 MB)
Research goal
The study was launched to provide the Canada Council with up to date information about the practices of Deaf artists and artists with disabilities and the state of the Deaf and disability arts sector in Canada. The Council has made a long-standing commitment to supporting Deaf and disability arts communities.
Led by a team of researchers and artists who are Deaf, have disabilities, and are allies to these communities, this study also aimed to generate courses of action that could lead to the recognition, support and promotion of such practices.
Research philosophy
The following collaborative approaches were utilized for this study:
- Participative and inclusive data collection methods
- Consideration of the power dynamics between researchers, practitioners, and members of marginalized communities
This research project received ethics approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee on Research with Human Participants (or CIEREH, Comité Institutionnel d’Éthique de la Recherche avec des Êtres Humains) of UQAM.
Participants
85 artists and cultural workers took part in interviews and focus groups held in eight cities across Canada during the summer of 2018. Participants reflected a range of experiences and backgrounds (e.g. language, gender, ethnocultural backgrounds, age, fields of practice, etc.). The majority of participants (84%) were involved with one or more cultural or artistic organizations. The Canada Council for the Arts and the project research team would like to thank them for their participation and points of view which were vital to the project’s success.
Research team
Véro Leduc, Lead researcher
Department of Social and Public Communications
Université du Québec à Montréal
Mouloud Boukala, Co-researcher
Media School
Université du Québec à Montréal
Joëlle Rouleau, Co-researcher
Department of Art History and Film Studies
Université de Montréal
In collaboration with Olivier Angrignon-Girouard, Mélina Bernier, Shandi Bouscatier, Line Grenier, Carolyne Grimard, Sarah Heussaff, Aimée Louw, Élodie Marcelli, Ashley McAskill, Darren Saunders, Tamar Tembeck, and Catherine Théroux.
We invite you to read the report and contact the Research, Measurement and Data Analytics Section at research@canadacouncil.ca if you have questions.
[1] Deaf and disability arts include, but is not limited to, Deaf arts, disability arts, mad arts, integrated/mixed ability arts and practices involving artists with cognitive disabilities.
Appendices
Document
Methodology (PDF 100.9 KB)
Document
Glossary (PDF 146.8 KB)
Document
Bibliography (PDF 270.9 KB)